Reflection week 11
We have Unit Beruniform (U.B) camp at TRRC, Tambunan.
In this week we learn about the Humanistic approach. Below are some understandings about these types of approach;
Some knowledge that is included in mathematical knowledge;
In this week we continue learn on the learning theories which in this week we touch about the constructivism and cognitivism theories. About the constructivism theories, it actually encourages pupils to construct their own ideas and using their own mind to generate or create new information according to what they have learned. About cognitivism, each pupils have their own level of cognitive skills but it is depends on the cooperative between teacher and pupils to enhance their cognitive thinking skills. By that, pupils can generate their ideas.
After being a month ‘out – station’, we continue back our lesson. In this week we learnt about Behaviorism and Cognitivism Learning theories. After discussing it, we discuss about the implication of Behaviorism through teaching and learning Mathematics. From our group, we decide that through behaviorism learning theories will be provided and opportunity to achieve success in learning and teaching Mathematics.
We have our School Base Experience. My S.B.E school’s is Sk.Stella Maris, Tanjung Aru,
In this week we have a lots of institute program like the Bina Insan Guru Program which held at Kg.Jawi – Jawi, Kota Belud, we been there about 4 days. At the same time, we also have our Education department visit to the Bahagaian Teknologi Pendidikan Negeri Sabah which locates at Penampang.
In Madam Lam class we had learnt about cooperative learning. In cooperative learning students in purposely structured heterogeneous groups to support the learning and others in the same group, mean they will each other in the group in order to make everybody understand to the learning session.
Beside that we are also learnt about the collaborative learning. Actually it is one of the methodologies and environments in which all learner engage each other in a common task in which each individual depends or and is accountable to each others among them and their environment.
In my opinion, when I learn this kind of types learning actually it encourage me to learn more about it which will be so useful during our next practicum. Any than that, it give us the opportunity to construct our own ideas and share them with others.
Gives a holistic learning and connects to other disciplines (interdisciplinary approach), and determines the usage of mathematics in society and in other groups – Students see the application and connection of mathematics not only in other disciplines but also in the real world. When students get exposed to the use and importance of mathematics in the real world, questions like “Why are we learning this?” and “When are we ever going to use this?” are answered automatically and clearly. Also, different professions and jobs use mathematics differently and accordingly.
Corrects inaccuracies within mathematics, increases the universality of mathematics, and recognizes and acknowledges the existence of “other” mathematics – In using a multicultural approach to the teaching of mathematics, the teachers are helping to overcome the existing deep-rooted Euro-centric bias relating to the origins and practices of mathematics. For example, is it still accurate and correct to call it Horner’s Method when the Chinese have used it about four hundred years earlier? (Li and Du, 1987) Also, multicultural teaching gives a clearer picture of how mathematics is done and practiced formally in an academic setting and informally outside the classroom. For example, drawing a rectangle in an academic setting will most likely start with the sides rather than with the diagonals, a practice commonly used in some parts of Africa (Gerdes, 1999).
Gives an education in awareness of students’ background(s) – It is true that students learn from teachers; however, it likewise is true that teachers learn from their students. Hence, making use of a multicultural approach enriches both students and teachers as they understand and value each other better.
Promotes critical thinking – Due to the fact that multicultural teaching of mathematics is multi-faceted, the students think of the subject more deeply and more broadly. The thinking, learning and application of the concepts are done in multiple perspectives.
The Humanistic Approach began in response to concerns by therapists against perceived limitations of Psychodynamic theories, especially psychoanalysis. Individuals like Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow felt existing (psychodynamic) theories failed to adequately address issues like the meaning of behavior, and the nature of healthy growth. However, the result was not simply new variations on psychodynamic theory, but rather a fundamentally new approach. The Humanistic Approach can be related to Behavioral psychology.
There are several factors which distinguish the Humanistic Approach from other approaches within psychology, including the emphasis on subjective meaning, a rejection of determinism, and a concern for positive growth rather than pathology. While one might argue that some psychodynamic theories provide a vision of healthy growth (including Jung's concept of individuation), the other characteristics distinguish the Humanistic Approach from every other approach within psychology (and sometimes lead theorists from other approaches to say the Humanistic Approach is not a science at all). Most psychologists believe that behavior can only be understood objectively (by an impartial observer), but the humanists argue that this results in concluding that an individual is incapable of understanding their own behavior--a view which they see as both paradoxical and dangerous to well-being. Instead, humanists like Rogers argue that the meaning of behavior is essentially personal and subjective; they further argue that accepting this idea is not unscientific, because ultimately all individuals are subjective: what makes science reliable is not that scientists are purely objective, but that the nature of observed events can be agreed upon by different observers (a process Rogers calls intersubjective verification).
The issues underlying the Humanistic Approach, and its differences from other approaches, are discussed more fully in the text, but the sources below provide useful supplementary information. One point worth noting: if you want to fully grasp the nature of the Humanistic Approach, you cannot consider it in abstract terms. Instead, you must consider if and how the ideas connect to your own experiencefor that is how humanistic psychologists believe the meaning of behavior is derived.
This week, I have learned about a classroom questioning. This is a method we use while teaching which can enhance the student involvement in the teaching and learning process. We use questioning everyday in our daily life in order to gain information from other people but in class we use questioning skills to make the students to think and moreover to test them.
In questioning, we need to be patient in the sense that not giving an answer to a question that we ask if the student can’t answer it straight away. We must give them time to think of an answer. When they still couldn’t answer then we provide them the answer. Question might not being ask only by teacher but also the students. They can ask question the teacher to obtain any useful information or guidance.
From this lesson, I have learned that to be an effective teacher we need to ask more question and get response from the students. To give a question, we need to consider the student level of knowledge so that we can ask them question suit to their level.
This week I learned about questioning which use is in teaching and learning session. One of the example that I got through to the internet, there is something said about Socratic teaching method. According to it, this type of method, using questions and answers to challenge assumptions, expose contradictions, and lead to new knowledge and wisdom is an undeniably powerful teaching approach.
A question is any sentence which has an interrogative form or function. In classroom settings, teacher questions are defined as instructional cues or stimuli that convey to students the content elements to be learned and directions for what they are to do and how they are to do it. The present review focuses on the relationship between teachers' classroom questioning behaviors and a variety of student outcomes, including achievement, retention, and level of student participation. This means that certain other subtopics within the general area of questioning are excluded from the present analysis. It does not deal, for example, with the effects of textual questions or test questions, and it is only incidentally concerned with methods used to impart study skills, including questioning strategies, to students. (Kathleen Cotton)
So, there are many purposes why teacher use the classroom questioning. There are;
· To develop interest and motivate students to become actively involved in lessons
· To evaluate students' preparation and check on homework or seatwork completion
· To develop critical thinking skills and inquiring attitudes
· To review and summarize previous lessons
· To nurture insights by exposing new relationships
· To assess achievement of instructional goals and objectives
· To stimulate students to pursue knowledge on their own
These purposes are generally pursued in the context of classroom recitation, defined as a series of teacher questions, each eliciting a student response and sometimes a teacher reaction to that response. Within these recitations, students follow a series of steps (consciously or unconsciously) in order to produce responses to the questions posed. These steps include:
So, in general the roles of classroom questioning have drawn a following conclusion when we apply the questioning teaching method. When we using Instruction which includes posing questions during lessons are more effective in producing achievement gains than instruction carried out without questioning students. Beside that, the Students perform better on test items previously asked as recitation questions than on items they have not been exposed to before. Furthermore, Oral questions posed during classroom recitations are more effective in fostering learning than are written questions, and also at the same time, Questions which focus student attention on salient elements in the lesson result in better comprehension than questions which do not.
In this week, we had been learning many types of approaches and teaching types. Firstly, we learn about the types of teaching methods like, Teacher centre, Student centre and also Media centre. We have divided into 3 groups which each groups have their own rules to explain about their teaching types. My group had given a task which explains about the teacher centre method. In my opinion, this types of teaching are more depend on the teacher to handle and controlled the teaching and learning session, but after a few reading and discussion with my group members, actually this kind of teaching is use more on explain the concept or definition of the topic we have to teach. By this way, it is easier for the pupils to understand first before they continue on the activity about the topic.
Beside that, in this week, we also learn about the Inductive and deductive approaches. A little information about these approaches, inductive begins with presentation on specific examples and ends with the formation of generalized principles, but the deductive it begins with presentation of generalized principles and ends with the generation of specific examples.
Both of this teaching types and also approaches, I realized actually there are variety of teaching and learning techniques outside but requires us to discover it. by discovering it, we not only can use it as in our teaching session in the future but also help us to be a critical thinker in order to produce an excellent teaching and learning session
We have done on presentation about Primary Mathematics Curriculum which our group present about the Money and Percentage syllabus in primary school. We precede our studies on the lesson plan but before that Madame Lam do quest us about all the question or maybe characteristic in doing the lesson plan. We given a situation and reflect on the question by giving proper answer which might we have to consider.
In addition, Madame Lam told us to do our own lesson plan following to the syllabus we choose (Money and percentage). This is my first experience doing lesson plan. I realize that it is not easy to do. There are many factors and technique we have to consider so that we can came out with a good lesson plan.
We are revisit back to the primary Mathematics Curriculum (
Actually by looking to the curriculum, we can get all the data. I realize that, we learn on what will happen in our future as a teacher especially in Mathematics subject. In addition, it is not easy to plan a good lesson plan. By looking each of the syllabuses, we must know the objective and what actually our goals are. Goal are easy to set but to achieve it are not easy. We have to prepare ourselves first so that we get what actually the lesson to be.
After a long holiday, we continued back focusing on our study. We face a new subject which is Planning and Teaching Mathematics (MTE 3107). This subject will be thought by Madame Lam Saw Yin.
A little bit about this subject, actually it telling us on how to planning an effective Mathematics lesson. Beside that, by this subject we can learn on how incorporate appropriate methods and techniques in planning by using relevant mathematical ideas.
In addition, we also teach on applications of mathematical learning theories in teaching and learning Mathematics.
In my opinion, this subject is more on preparing us to face the real situation of teaching Mathematics subject and so other subject. This is very good for us so that we can manage well in order to give the appropriate teaching and learning session.
After a long break, we return to the institute and begin our session for the next semester. This is our first week and we still haven’t started any lesson on any subject. For Madam Lam subject Planning and Teaching Mathematics, we have started to do our ISL which is to find the mathematics curriculum specification for year 1 to year 6. For me I only manage to find the curriculum specification for year 4 and year 2 and I’m still trying to find the other through the internets.
I have already gone through the course pro forma and I found out that this subject will be an interesting subject. I’m looking forward to know this subject better and I hope I can cope up with the entire lesson which will come up later. I’m trying to change the way I study for this semester and I should start to reflect back what I have been through last semester.
This week, we learned on mathematics curriculum specification for year 1 to year 6. By looking at the syllabus, it will be easy for a teacher making a lesson plan following all the data given such as learning objective and learning outcomes. A good lesson plan will make the teaching and learning process become more interesting and attractive.
For our ISL task, we were asked to search and present two topics from year 1 until year 6 mathematics curriculum specification. Our group chose Money and Percentage topics.